Monthly Archive for November, 2007

No Suit Required (Revisited)

This article was big for me as I wasn’t aware of anyone doing anything remotely unique from a management capacity previous to stumbling across this in Wired. I thought it worth a revisit now that it’s been a year. If you haven’t ever read it, it’s worth your time.

Really the only thing that hasn’t happened yet, that I am really excited for, is the advent of enabling artists to sell their intellectual property as stock. Profits from which will be taxed at the same lower rate as other capital gains. Artists will be able to offer shares in their enterprises which people will be able to make equity investments. Eventually, a major band could become its own public company. The key being that the value of a band would be measured like a stock and would receive capitalization in expectation of future earnings.

My expectation with regard to this is that young upstart bands will have an easier time finding funding to create, record, promote, and tour their music as they will be able to enlist the support and the collective motivations of their investors. Very likely, their projects will move forward with faster returns.

Oh, and most importantly, fans would be able to experience an even more visceral connection to their favorite artist by actually having an ownership stake in the creative enterprise.

Wired 14.09: No Suit Required

Rock Band vs. Real Band — Slate Magazine

Funny article in Slate today as Sleater-Kinney’s guitarist Carrie Brownstein tests out the new video game Rock Band. In describing the playing experience between the video game versus being a real-life rocker she posits this:

Rock Band: Tetris meets Simon meets karaoke. You need to have hand-eye coordination and be moderately literate (if you are the singer). There are no monitor mixes to fuss with, and your sound is consistent. Actually, your sound never changes, which kind of gets old. However, if your band messes up, you are mercifully and magically removed from the gig and you get to start over.

Real band: It’s hard to beat the visceral high of playing live and creating something spontaneous. But if your band is having an off night, you still have to stand there in front of a crowd and finish the set.

Sleater-Kinney’s guitarist tests out Rock Band. - By Carrie Brownstein - Slate Magazine

For All The Rock In China — New York Times

Solid article in the New York Times yesterday on the vast burgeoning entertainment market of China. Once largely closed to foreign music, the country has gradually loosened restrictions and — at a time when record sales here in the West continue to plunge, and new sources of revenue have become essential — emerged as a crucial territory on pop’s global map.

Summary here:

To no surprise, there is rampant piracy of CDs and a minimal touring infrastructure. And many services taken for granted elsewhere, like the collection and distribution of recording royalties, are not fully established. But despite these obstacles, the broad commercial potential is making the country an irresistible draw, with money to be made from live shows, merchandise and technologies like cellphone ring tones.

But many Chinese labels, nimble and unencumbered by tradition, have adapted to the contaminated marketplace in ways that Western companies are struggling with. Viewing CDs as a loss-leader, they routinely sign groups to all-encompassing contracts that allow the label to share in revenues from touring, merchandise and endorsements.

The labels say that piracy has made the effort futile. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, a trade group, estimates that 85 percent of the CDs sold in China are counterfeit. Leong Mayseey, the federation’s regional director for Asia, says the piracy rate for downloaded songs is close to 100 percent.

“The Chinese music industry will be the model for the world’s music industry one day,” said Shen Lihui, the founder of Modern Sky, a small company that has released around 100 albums — most money losers, Mr. Shen said — but also has a host of auxiliary businesses, producing books, videos and Web sites.

So hey, it’s the next frontier and they are already accepting of music as the loss-leader to fuel other revenue streams. Very exciting, forward-thinking stuff. But, it should be noted that sponsorships are already comfortably the norm in today’s Western music festival culture and leveraged to keep ticket prices at a reasonable rate - just look at all the sponsors of major festivals like Lollapalooza, Bonnaroo, Coachella, and Austin City Limits.

And for the record, I did check out Lonely China Day when they toured here in the US last winter and they were very cool. Regrettably, Rebuilding the Rights of Statues did not perform that night.

On a side note, and although it’s not exactly China (rather South Korea), I always thought this blurb in Wired (September 2006) was really great example of the how an artist’s music will be monetized going forward: 403 Ways To Slice A CD

For All The Rock In China - New York Times

RCRD LBL

RCRD LBLA next-generation record label, called RCRD LBL launched today. It is a network of ad supported online record labels and blogs offering completely free music and multimedia content from emerging and established artists.

A joint venture of Downtown Records, the independent label behind Gnarls Barkley and others, and Peter Rojas, a journalist and entrepreneur who founded the respected technology blogs Gizmodo and Engadget, RCRD LBL is a hybrid record label and blog; its releases are to be posted on the company’s web site for downloading, free and unrestricted by digital-rights management software that limits copying.

As sited in the WSJ article, in a negative report on Warner Music Group Corp. earlier this month, Pali Research analyst Richard Greenfield wrote: “A new model for music consumption must emerge, and that model most likely involves DRM-free downloadable music at no cost to consumers, fully supported by advertising.” This, Mr. Greenfield said, is a direct result of the fact that “an increasing majority of world-wide consumers simply view recorded music as free.” That report helped push down the stock of Warner Music almost 10% in a day.

Visitors to the site are welcome to download and enjoy any music posted on the site, provided it is being used for personal, non-commercial use. You can do things like make copies of the tracks and put them on all of your music-playing devices, burn them on to mix CDs for your friends, even use them in videos you make, as long as you’re only doing these things for strictly noncommercial purposes. In short: RCRD LBL is happy for you to share their music, but you’re not allowed to make money off of it. If you’d like to to use one of their tracks in any way that would be considered a commercial use, you must contact them first.

Music Test: Can a Firm Profit From Free Tunes? - WSJ.com

RCRD LBL Solves the Free Music Riddle | Listening Post from Wired.com

How Vinyl Records Are Made

Something I’ve often wondered…is there ever anything not interesting on the Discovery channel?

Part 1: Creating The Master Disc

Part 2: Pressing The Records

WIRED: How Vinyl Records Are Made via TUNING

What Radiohead’s In Rainbows Has Taught Me — Coolfer

A solid article on Coolfer yesterday. The main thing I would add with regard to artists offering a “varied number of price points in order to capture as much value as possible”, is that they already do!! They come in the form of a concert ticket, t-shirt (or other merchandise), or a shrink-wrapped CD. It’s not explicitly about selling songs (or packaged music), it’s about selling a brand that represents an idea that is bigger than ourselves. It’s art and it’s sometimes (probably most of the time) hard to quantify or qualify.

What makes Radiohead unique among artists is that they understand what they are selling - they understand their own identity myth that is forged from the ethos and aesthetic experienced through their music. And they, themselves, are the owners of their artistic message which they have used to build lasting emotional linkages with their fanbase.

It’s about offering a medium, a virtual dialogue, a token in physical form. It could be anything really, and they know it. They know people want to feel some connection to the idea, and they want to experience it and advertise it too. This is bigger than simply selling music, it’s about the artistic legacy.

What Radiohead’s In Rainbows Has Taught Me

Radiohead Questions Album Sales Report, Sets CD Release Date — Digital Music News

Regardless of what the actual numbers are, the success of this project from Radiohead’s perspective will not be based on how many people paid for the music in it’s digital form. It’s all about ancillary revenues for them.

Why do we insist on examining this effort in a vacuum, and start anticipating the follow-on effect? I’m guessing they will command an unprecedented fee to tour and play festivals this Spring / Summer 2008, and maybe (hopefully) go the Pearl Jam route wherein distributing /selling their live shows at a low cost via download. They will undoubtedly own the copyright of their material going forward, as their deal will in all likelihood be a licensing deal with XL (UK) and ATO/TBD Records (US).

Why did Paste Magazine allow subscribers to name their price? Simply to increase it’s distribution / readership in order to generate more advertising revenue.

Why did The Format (Nettwerk) allow people to download their year-old album Dog Problems for free from June 25 to July 15, 2007? So they cold use Google Analytics to tell them where people are downloading from in order to better focus their touring efforts.

Why does Trent Reznor want NIN music to be cheaper (or even free)? So more people can have the music to generate an interest in attending the live show when NIN tours. He knows touring revenues are the lifeblood of the industry going forward, and connecting with fans in a live environment will prolong his career.

I really like what he did with pricing option on the new Saul Williams release, 192 Kbps MP3s for free and 320 Kbps for $5.00 (with the option of uncompressed FLAC).

http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/11/choose-your-own.html

I think 192 Kbps is a formidable bit rate, the sound quality is good enough (for me) and the file size is very practical.

I have never listened to Saul Williams, but I will be downloading his new release. And guess what? If I like it and am entertained by it, I will probably purchase the CD and/or go check out his live show.

I am also willing to bet Trent and Saul are probably running Google Analytics on the site so they know how to better focus the touring efforts.

Radiohead Questions Album Sales Report, Sets CD Release Date — Digital Music News

What Radiohead Hath Wrought: Seattle Sound November 2007

There’s a great article in Seattle Sound Magazine (November 2007, pp 58-61) that has Seattle’s top label heads discussing what Thom Yorke and Company’s divorce from the music industry means to them, you and the future of the little guy in music.

What Radiohead Hath Wrought : Seattle Sound November 2007

Note: article is located within digital edition of magazine and can only be accessed via the RealRead viewer - flip to page 58.

Attention Is The New Currency

Attention is the New Currency - Forget the idea of “controlling distribution” www.endofcontrol.com The new free online book by Media Futurist Gerd Leonhard.

Radiohead Numbers Emerge, 62 Percent Paid Nothing — Digital Music News

Let’s pull our heads out of the sand here. It really doesn’t matter how many people paid, or didn’t pay for the new Radiohead album in it’s digital form. The reality is that they now have it, and if they like it, they will probably buy the physical release, or a concert ticket, or some merchandise, or something branded with Radiohead. This isn’t a question of fan loyalty, rather a component of a larger sales / marketing effort that drives the other three major revenue streams: publishing, merchandising, and touring income. If 38% of people actually paid for the music in it’s digital form, then that’s simply bonus revenue (i.e. gravy). Music is the loss-leader now. It’s what gets people in the store, spending their money on other goods.

I, for one, downloaded the album and paid nothing. But, I really love In Rainbows and plan to purchase the physical CD and hopefully have the opportunity to see them live (as I have never been so fortunate).

Radiohead Numbers Emerge, 62 Percent Paid Nothing — Digital Music News