Tag Archive for 'radiohead effect'

What Radiohead’s In Rainbows Has Taught Me — Coolfer

A solid article on Coolfer yesterday. The main thing I would add with regard to artists offering a “varied number of price points in order to capture as much value as possible”, is that they already do!! They come in the form of a concert ticket, t-shirt (or other merchandise), or a shrink-wrapped CD. It’s not explicitly about selling songs (or packaged music), it’s about selling a brand that represents an idea that is bigger than ourselves. It’s art and it’s sometimes (probably most of the time) hard to quantify or qualify.

What makes Radiohead unique among artists is that they understand what they are selling - they understand their own identity myth that is forged from the ethos and aesthetic experienced through their music. And they, themselves, are the owners of their artistic message which they have used to build lasting emotional linkages with their fanbase.

It’s about offering a medium, a virtual dialogue, a token in physical form. It could be anything really, and they know it. They know people want to feel some connection to the idea, and they want to experience it and advertise it too. This is bigger than simply selling music, it’s about the artistic legacy.

What Radiohead’s In Rainbows Has Taught Me

Radiohead Questions Album Sales Report, Sets CD Release Date — Digital Music News

Regardless of what the actual numbers are, the success of this project from Radiohead’s perspective will not be based on how many people paid for the music in it’s digital form. It’s all about ancillary revenues for them.

Why do we insist on examining this effort in a vacuum, and start anticipating the follow-on effect? I’m guessing they will command an unprecedented fee to tour and play festivals this Spring / Summer 2008, and maybe (hopefully) go the Pearl Jam route wherein distributing /selling their live shows at a low cost via download. They will undoubtedly own the copyright of their material going forward, as their deal will in all likelihood be a licensing deal with XL (UK) and ATO/TBD Records (US).

Why did Paste Magazine allow subscribers to name their price? Simply to increase it’s distribution / readership in order to generate more advertising revenue.

Why did The Format (Nettwerk) allow people to download their year-old album Dog Problems for free from June 25 to July 15, 2007? So they cold use Google Analytics to tell them where people are downloading from in order to better focus their touring efforts.

Why does Trent Reznor want NIN music to be cheaper (or even free)? So more people can have the music to generate an interest in attending the live show when NIN tours. He knows touring revenues are the lifeblood of the industry going forward, and connecting with fans in a live environment will prolong his career.

I really like what he did with pricing option on the new Saul Williams release, 192 Kbps MP3s for free and 320 Kbps for $5.00 (with the option of uncompressed FLAC).

http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/11/choose-your-own.html

I think 192 Kbps is a formidable bit rate, the sound quality is good enough (for me) and the file size is very practical.

I have never listened to Saul Williams, but I will be downloading his new release. And guess what? If I like it and am entertained by it, I will probably purchase the CD and/or go check out his live show.

I am also willing to bet Trent and Saul are probably running Google Analytics on the site so they know how to better focus the touring efforts.

Radiohead Questions Album Sales Report, Sets CD Release Date — Digital Music News

What Radiohead Hath Wrought: Seattle Sound November 2007

There’s a great article in Seattle Sound Magazine (November 2007, pp 58-61) that has Seattle’s top label heads discussing what Thom Yorke and Company’s divorce from the music industry means to them, you and the future of the little guy in music.

What Radiohead Hath Wrought : Seattle Sound November 2007

Note: article is located within digital edition of magazine and can only be accessed via the RealRead viewer - flip to page 58.

Radiohead Numbers Emerge, 62 Percent Paid Nothing — Digital Music News

Let’s pull our heads out of the sand here. It really doesn’t matter how many people paid, or didn’t pay for the new Radiohead album in it’s digital form. The reality is that they now have it, and if they like it, they will probably buy the physical release, or a concert ticket, or some merchandise, or something branded with Radiohead. This isn’t a question of fan loyalty, rather a component of a larger sales / marketing effort that drives the other three major revenue streams: publishing, merchandising, and touring income. If 38% of people actually paid for the music in it’s digital form, then that’s simply bonus revenue (i.e. gravy). Music is the loss-leader now. It’s what gets people in the store, spending their money on other goods.

I, for one, downloaded the album and paid nothing. But, I really love In Rainbows and plan to purchase the physical CD and hopefully have the opportunity to see them live (as I have never been so fortunate).

Radiohead Numbers Emerge, 62 Percent Paid Nothing — Digital Music News