Tag Archive for 'Trent Reznor'

This One’s On Me: Reznor Just Gives It Away — Digital Music News

NIN - The Slip (cover art)Last week Trent Reznor came out of nowhere (once again) and offered a new NIN album totally free, a move that is undoubtedly meant to boost fan loyalty. The album, called The Slip, is available without DRM and in multiple formats. “Thank you for your continued and loyal support over the years - this one’s on me,” Reznor wrote on the NIN.com site.

Fans can grab the album in a variety of formats, including MP3, various lossless (FLAC or Apple), or 24-bit/96-KHz WAV files (better than CD quality). Vinyl and CD versions will go on sale in July.

Not only is The Slip available for free, but it was released under the Creative Commons “attribution noncommercial share-alike” license. A note on the NIN.com site says: “We encourage you to remix it, share it with your friends, post it on your blog, play it on your podcast, give it to strangers, etc.”

Additionally, Nine Inch Nails announced a unique concert pre-sale that offers registered fans the best seats, a ticket imprinted with their name, early venue access and more. Simply put, Reznor is paving the way for the next generation of musicians who control their content and thrive via a direct connection to fans.

Lefsetz chimes in on the NIN promotion, and while I agree with many of his observations, I am at odds with him saying that Reznor did it wrong by offering an entire album at once:

“As for Trent dropping another album… I wouldn’t do it this way. Maybe he sees the record as a cohesive whole. But the key in the future is a little bit on a regular basis. Because this is what fans WANT! New music, more info, they want to feed their addiction. Rather than drop a load on them infrequently, give them something they can ponder for a few days or a week, then leave them hungry for a MONTH FROM NOW!”

Although this is a very progressive idea, one that Mark Cuban offered a few months ago, this isn’t what I would’ve wanted and I don’t feel like serializing the free tracks is all that compelling. If it was done that way, I probably would’ve waited until the entire album was available before I would bother visiting the site and downloading the tracks. I really have to disagree with Lefsetz on this one.

Recently, the band Coldplay offered a free download of the new single off their forthcoming album, and although I am a casual fan of Coldplay (which is to say I bought three of their previous albums), I don’t feel compelled to retrieve their free track. Why? There’s no perception of value present for me - definitely not like there is when an entire album is offered for free.

Radiohead - NIN - Coldplay

So, I ran across this article at Hitwise Intelligence (graph above) that measures the share of US Internet visits of Radiohead vs. NIN vs. Coldplay websites. I guess you can say it measures a free album vs. a free track as suggested by the size of Radiohead’s spike (back in September ‘07) vs. Coldplay’s spike (this month). It will be interesting to see going forward if Coldplay’s website visits remain higher after the release of the single than before and also NIN - The Slip spike vs. Coldplay’s spike (as I don’t believe that is represented on the graph).

Again, I don’t believe releasing a single free track for download is substantial enough to get me to make an effort to visit an Artist’s website. Very little perception of value - even when I am a fan. Thanks Trent for the free album - definitely worth my time.

Nine Inch Nails Gives Fans The Slip | Listening Post from Wired.com

Lefsetz Letter » Blog Archive » Trent’s Album

This One’s On Me: Reznor Just Gives It Away — Digital Music News

Hitwise Intelligence: Coldplay Compared To NIN And Radiohead

—————-
Now playing: Nine Inch Nails - 1,000,000
via FoxyTunes

Saul Williams Isn’t Disheartened | Tech News Blog - CNET News.com

So much great stuff in this Saul Williams interview… It’s hard to select just one quote to frame it all.

CNET: Trent talked about how happy he is that your music is in more iPods than ever before.
Williams: To me that’s the real deal. That’s how I see it. And that’s what leaves me not feeling disappointed because we all know that artists earn the most from touring. So it doesn’t work against me giving it away free to so many listeners. The more people that are into it, the more people that say ‘I got to see this live.’

Now, go read the entire interview.

Unlike Trent Reznor, Saul Williams isnt disheartened | Tech news blog - CNET News.com

Radiohead Questions Album Sales Report, Sets CD Release Date — Digital Music News

Regardless of what the actual numbers are, the success of this project from Radiohead’s perspective will not be based on how many people paid for the music in it’s digital form. It’s all about ancillary revenues for them.

Why do we insist on examining this effort in a vacuum, and start anticipating the follow-on effect? I’m guessing they will command an unprecedented fee to tour and play festivals this Spring / Summer 2008, and maybe (hopefully) go the Pearl Jam route wherein distributing /selling their live shows at a low cost via download. They will undoubtedly own the copyright of their material going forward, as their deal will in all likelihood be a licensing deal with XL (UK) and ATO/TBD Records (US).

Why did Paste Magazine allow subscribers to name their price? Simply to increase it’s distribution / readership in order to generate more advertising revenue.

Why did The Format (Nettwerk) allow people to download their year-old album Dog Problems for free from June 25 to July 15, 2007? So they cold use Google Analytics to tell them where people are downloading from in order to better focus their touring efforts.

Why does Trent Reznor want NIN music to be cheaper (or even free)? So more people can have the music to generate an interest in attending the live show when NIN tours. He knows touring revenues are the lifeblood of the industry going forward, and connecting with fans in a live environment will prolong his career.

I really like what he did with pricing option on the new Saul Williams release, 192 Kbps MP3s for free and 320 Kbps for $5.00 (with the option of uncompressed FLAC).

http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/11/choose-your-own.html

I think 192 Kbps is a formidable bit rate, the sound quality is good enough (for me) and the file size is very practical.

I have never listened to Saul Williams, but I will be downloading his new release. And guess what? If I like it and am entertained by it, I will probably purchase the CD and/or go check out his live show.

I am also willing to bet Trent and Saul are probably running Google Analytics on the site so they know how to better focus the touring efforts.

Radiohead Questions Album Sales Report, Sets CD Release Date — Digital Music News